The arguments about MFA programs are often repeated, yet seldom get anywhere. See the threads now in mobylives.com.
My thoughts, one month clear of my thesis defense:
- This should be obvious, but let’s note it: you can write beautifully without getting an MFA. Example: my friend Joel Turnipseed. Or Minneapolitan Emily Carter. And, oh yes, Shakespeare. Tolstoy. Woolf.
- There is not an MFA style. Either that or Flannery O’Connor, Denis Johnson, Jane Smiley, T. C. Boyle, Lorrie Moore, Rick Moody, and David Foster Wallace share a style.
- What is called the MFA style describes a small number of books written by people in their twenties who have gone quickly from MFA programs to publishing without much of a break. Their prose tends to be obedient; their faces, photogenic. They have yet to grow adjectives. They sometimes are less writers than articulate demographics.
- Writers have always formed communities, showed each other their work, and—either cynically or sympathetically—advanced each other’s careers. See Pound and Eliot, Fitzgerald and Hemingway, Robert Bly and Donald Hall, Bloomsbury.
- MFA programs will not break your style but they will bend it. MFA courses are taught by serious writers, and to be a serious writer is to evolve a style and to evolve a style is to make aggregated decisions about how to write. Those decisions will influence how you teach others to write. It is one’s job as a student to acknowledge the amazing strengths and human weaknesses of your teachers, learn from them, and then to move on.
- The connections you make in a decent MFA program may help some; if you are favored by the MFA Gods—I wasn’t—they help a great deal. But the reason people are favored is because they are talented. Those are the plusses. The minus: the term MFA now has a stigma in the publishing world.
- Workshops suck, and in doing so they provide a valuable life lesson. Life is a gauntlet of half-assed criticism. One of the essential skills is learning how to ignore bad criticism and even find the good criticism in the bad.
- All of my teachers acknowledged the weaknesses of workshops and tried to reform the classic focus-group bullying. Minnesota also emphasized reading-as-writers and writing-as-readers courses. Steven Polansky’s class—in which people imitated classic prose styles—was the one class I really regret missing, although David Treuer's long fiction class also sounded great. MFA programs tend to focus on short fiction and Treuer is a thoughtful man.
- I spent a lot of money, I became an anthology of the effects of stress, and my back hurt like hell.
- I was a better writer when I left than when I started. And I think I was a better writer than I would have been if I had spent three years writing on my own.
Thanks--I think--to Stix for pointing me to the mobylives.com "brouhaha."
Recent Comments